![]() ![]() ![]() While the iTunes 11.0.1 update released in late 2012 did address some of the worst issues introduced with iTunes 11, I still found myself constantly looking at the Spinning Beach Ball of Death, even for the most mundane of tasks (like starting or stopping playback!). Meanwhile, of course, my music collection is not getting any smaller.Ī couple of months ago, I decided that I had finally had enough. Instead, as time goes by, iTunes is becoming more and more bloated with things that are at best marginally useful to the music collector, and it’s becoming slower and slower, and buggier and buggier. But of course, hoping that Apple itself would release such a product is nothing more than a pipe dream. For years now, I have been praying for the introduction of some kind of version of iTunes optimized for music collectors - a kind of iTunes Pro, if you will. ![]() What are the options for managing these digital files? Well, on the Mac side, there seems to be pretty much only one option, which is iTunes. The CDs are effectively my hard drive backup, and the medium for listening to the music on my main sound system, whereas I listen to the digital files with the sound system in my office.) (I still buy lots of music on CD, but I convert everything into digital files on my hard drive as well. This means, among other things, that I have amassed a rather vast collection of recordings, which needs to be maintained and managed. I also follow a number of other artists fairly closely, and also have a wide range of other musical interests. (My knowledge and appreciation of these bootleg recordings might affect my perception of the artist’s œuvre, but it certainly does not have an impact on my decisions when it comes to purchasing the artist’s official releases: I still buy everything he puts out.) These recordings might not have the blessing of the artist himself, but at least there is no money involved and collecting them does not deprive the artist of any revenue. But thankfully, with the advent of the Internet, it has become possible to build a very decent collection of bootleg recordings without spending a cent. Back in the pre-Internet era, I actually spent some of my hard-earned cash on bootleg LPs, CDs, and VHS tapes. A bit further down, it's also listed as a direct dependency of express one level higher.As a music lover, I collect, among other things, lots of bootleg recordings of live Prince concerts. In the screenshot you posted is a dependency of body-parser. You can validate this, as every package in your dependency graph that says deduped, can be found at least one more time in the graph, usually at a higher level. This makes total sense as otherwise one package would have to look in the node_modules of some other package (which would be kind of messy) and helps to simplify the dependencies. The same package is referenced, so it doesn't have to be installed twice.Īlso, it moves the packages "up the tree" (flattens the tree). In other words, it looks if multiple packages have the same dependencies (meaning the same packages and version range) and "points" them to the same package. Searches the local package tree and attempts to simplify the overall structure by moving dependencies further up the tree, where they can be more effectively shared by multiple dependent packages. The documentation for npm dedupe explains how npm does this: Deduped is short for "deduplicated" (duplicates were removed). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |